HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory1.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateDec 22 '20 at 08:02
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 202
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 505
54% 428 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gigabyte(1458 3546) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.81% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 0.3
2% 1.73 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.81%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 373 355 366 365 366 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 360
Write 348
Mixed 295
SusWrite 364
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 35.3
117% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 38.3
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 29
34% 57.5 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 131%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
271GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 111 112 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 99.3
Write 98.7
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 112
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 69%
USB Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 6.4 7.4 7.5 7.6 7.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
6.38% Terrible
Read 25.7
Write 6.5
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 7.3
11% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.38%
Great: 8%
SMI USB disk 8GB
0GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 5.1 3.4 6.2 6.7 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
2.31% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 2.7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 5.4
7% 5.32 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.31%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-055.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.2% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.6
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,751 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback