Hp-pavilion KP272AA-AB9 a6412.pt

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion KP272AA-AB9 a6412.pt (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI Boston
Memory	0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101006
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 18 '17 at 22:24
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual E2160-$47 4,697 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Memory 64.4 1-Core 20.7 2-Core 40.9 31% 42 Pts	4-Core 40.5 8-Core 41.5 5% 41 Pts	64-Core 41 2% 41 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4 (94) Unknown 255 255 0 (95) Unknown 255 255 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 12 (AA) Unknown 100 100 14 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 255 255 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C2) HDA temperature 69 67 141735231519 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 61 (F1) Unknown 100 100 65 (F2) Unknown 100 100 48 (F4) Unknown 100 100 0 (F5) Unknown 100 100 2 (F6) Unknown 100 100 3048	30.1% Below average	Read 228 Write 116 Mixed 165 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 21.8 4K Mixed 4.33 45% 14.9 MB/s	DQ Read 22 DQ Write 31.5 DQ Mixed 4.67 10% 19.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 85%
General USB Flash Disk 32GB 144 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 30GB free, PID 8005 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 25.3 Write 8.72 Mixed 16 19% 16.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.19 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.53 83% 1.76 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hp-pavilion KP272AA-AB9 a6412.pt

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)