Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory23.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 18:37
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 136
54% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 243
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX550 series
XFX(1682 9550) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1203 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 25.1
13% 22.9 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 18.5
Splatting 24.8
19% 23 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BT58SSD13S 1TB
838GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0110A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 290 4.3 2.2 2.8 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 309
Write 5.2
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 113
23% 109 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 17.9
31% 9.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 97%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
108GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 84 84 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 75.1
Write 46.5
Mixed 47.1
SusWrite 84.1
47% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 59%
WD Elements 25A1 3TB
233GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 55 56 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 93.3
Write 83.7
Mixed 57
SusWrite 56.7
95% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.7
238% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 137 138 138 140 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 105
Write 103
Mixed 44.4
SusWrite 138
132% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 53%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
8GB free, PID 0745
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 10 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 11.2
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 11
19% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.9
117% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Dimm2_Manufacturer Dimm3_Manufacturer Dimm6_Manufacturer Dimm7_Manufacturer 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.8% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 16.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X79 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $92
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback