MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 138%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics204% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160412
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 17:17
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$175
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 92.8
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 196
77% 129 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 544
60% 460 Pts
64-Core 697
47% 697 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,500
MSI(1462 3884) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
204% Outstanding
Lighting 267
Reflection 253
Parallax 299
216% 273 fps
MRender 305
Gravity 225
Splatting 165
191% 232 fps
Poor: 190%
This bench: 204%
Great: 258%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$100
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 28 28 28 29 27 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38% Below average
Read 232
Write 34
Mixed 52
SusWrite 28.7
19% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 29.3
4K Mixed 15.6
68% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 37.9
DQ Mixed 63.4
67% 118 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 38%
Great: 116%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$110
84GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 439 450 448 453 456 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 454
Mixed 417
SusWrite 449
102% 450 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 50.4
163% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 497GB
1GB free
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,177
Write 1,891
Mixed 1445
408% 1,838 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 61.4
197% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 763
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 559
416% 562 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 130%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$40
82GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 118 137 143 152 158 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 157
Write 159
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 139
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
6.72% Terrible
Read 22.7
Write 14.7
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 4.8
18% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
35% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.72%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB-$90
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 35.8
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 20.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 1,039 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $765
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $180Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $265Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $315Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback