Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 08:50
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 92.5
1-Core 135
2-Core 242
89% 156 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 682
69% 559 Pts
64-Core 903
56% 903 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2005) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.27% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 8.5
5% 8.17 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 11.9
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.27%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,280
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
167% Outstanding
Lighting 236
Reflection 240
Parallax 319
192% 265 fps
MRender 247
Gravity 225
Splatting 160
167% 210 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 167%
Great: 230%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
304GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1766 1728 1676 1609 1858 1772 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 1,941
Write 2,034
Mixed 1204
SusWrite 1,735
389% 1,729 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 62.9
208% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,042
DQ Write 1,282
DQ Mixed 1,118
856% 1,148 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 300%
Great: 425%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 29.9
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 36
SC Mixed 27.8
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback