Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 140% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 125% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH530
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190709
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '20 at 08:43
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Memory 92.5 1-Core 134 2-Core 255 90% 160 Pts	4-Core 484 8-Core 764 77% 624 Pts	64-Core 918 57% 918 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 2005) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.25% Terrible	Lighting 6.3 Reflection 9.9 Parallax 8.7 5% 8.3 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 7.5 Splatting 11.7 8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.25% Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Asus(1043 87B3) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	152% Outstanding	Lighting 208 Reflection 219 Parallax 288 169% 238 fps	MRender 216 Gravity 217 Splatting 156 157% 196 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 152% Great: 230%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 306GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1546 1789 1759 1634 1606 1586 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	295% Outstanding	Read 1,920 Write 1,940 Mixed 1,220 SusWrite 1,653 378% 1,683 MB/s	4K Read 47.5 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 61.7 208% 72.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1054 DQ Write 1308 DQ Mixed 1,121 862% 1,161 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 295% Great: 425%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FD 2x16GB 2,188 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	MC Read 33.2 MC Write 34.9 MC Mixed 29.8 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 37.2 SC Mixed 28.4 82% 28.6 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,060x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,071x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,447x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	597x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	398x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	249x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,755x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	371x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16