Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 156%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics171% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH530
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 08:43
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 130
2-Core 259
92% 161 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 695
77% 592 Pts
64-Core 828
56% 828 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2005) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
5.76% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 8.7
5% 8.3 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 11.7
6% 10.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.76%
Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,500
Asus(1043 87B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
171% Outstanding
Lighting 208
Reflection 219
Parallax 288
168% 238 fps
MRender 216
Gravity 217
Splatting 156
175% 196 fps
Poor: 191%
This bench: 171%
Great: 261%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$265
306GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1546 1789 1759 1634 1606 1586 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
295% Outstanding
Read 1,920
Write 1,940
Mixed 1,220
SusWrite 1,653
378% 1,683 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 61.7
208% 72.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1054
DQ Write 1308
DQ Mixed 1,121
862% 1,161 MB/s
Poor: 207%
This bench: 295%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS16G4S26BFSD.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 29.8
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 37.2
SC Mixed 28.4
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 6,035 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback