Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics166% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme-Z  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '20 at 14:42
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 96.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 242
88% 154 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 578
59% 477 Pts
64-Core 576
36% 576 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Lighting 254
Reflection 217
Parallax 213
207% 228 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 161
Splatting 141
135% 168 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 166%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 89 93 88 94 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 162
Write 111
Mixed 126
SusWrite 92.9
28% 123 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 66.1
4K Mixed 27.9
107% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 83.2
69% 99.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 61%
PNY ELITE 240GB
85GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 21 22 21 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10.5% Very poor
Read 22
Write 20.5
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 21.7
5% 21.2 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 7.1
25% 7.53 MB/s
DQ Read 14.2
DQ Write 13.7
DQ Mixed 9.6
8% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
358GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 141 144 144 144 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 137
Write 132
Mixed 89.5
SusWrite 143
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 109%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
15GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 72 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 88.5
Write 81.2
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 72.7
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
355GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 74 73 72 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 75.7
Write 55.5
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 72.6
47% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 43%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$80
153GB free
Firmware: 12.01C01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 49 48 50 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 42.2
Write 40.2
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 48.9
30% 40.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
73.8% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 23.6
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 23.2
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 51.1
78% 51.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV Extreme-Z Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback