Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory19.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateDec 19 '20 at 02:32
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 76
2-Core 183
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 466
48% 387 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 144
Parallax 129
108% 135 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 138
Splatting 122
103% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 112 86 85 83 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 358
Write 397
Mixed 308
SusWrite 138
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 42.2
132% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 134%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
148GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 118 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 77.1
Write 74.6
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 119
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
368GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 103 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 112
Write 100
Mixed 83
SusWrite 102
74% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
567GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 120 117 120 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 119
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 101%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
312GB free, PID ab24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 94 94 94 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 48.2
Write 84.8
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 92
98% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
179% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 29.2
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,698 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback