Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory19.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200827
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 19 '20 at 00:01
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Memory 71
1-Core 155
2-Core 310
94% 179 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 984
94% 776 Pts
64-Core 1,450
90% 1,450 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
EVGA(3842 3755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 215
Reflection 203
Parallax 194
175% 204 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 153
Splatting 135
128% 160 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 147%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73
799GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 623 629 634 640 643 644 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 740
Write 663
Mixed 617
SusWrite 636
150% 664 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 75.5
256% 89.6 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 508
DQ Mixed 270
290% 487 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 174%
Great: 295%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
16GB free
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 472
Write 458
Mixed 380
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 30
103% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 174
153% 222 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 323 329 330 325 326 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 370
Write 309
Mixed 182
SusWrite 326
217% 297 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 1.9
493% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 200%
Great: 201%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK8GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK8GX4M2B3200C16 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.3% Good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.5
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 26.3
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $734
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback