Performance Results


Gaming 114% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 100% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA550
Memory	24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200916
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '20 at 12:16
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Memory 89.2 1-Core 139 2-Core 270 92% 166 Pts	4-Core 514 8-Core 732 78% 623 Pts	64-Core 903 56% 903 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Nvidia(10DE 2486) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	122% Outstanding	Lighting 172 Reflection 167 Parallax 164 141% 168 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 136 Splatting 116 100% 123 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 341GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1657 819 612 592 612 598 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	251% Outstanding	Read 1,957 Write 1,829 Mixed 1,247 SusWrite 815 327% 1,462 MB/s	4K Read 55.4 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 73 238% 81 MB/s	DQ Read 1,212 DQ Write 978 DQ Mixed 1,090 818% 1,094 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 251% Great: 296%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 801GB free Firmware: P3CR021 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1368 1416 1426 1365 1401 1441 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	250% Outstanding	Read 1,186 Write 1,370 Mixed 1,102 SusWrite 1,403 286% 1,265 MB/s	4K Read 58.7 4K Write 141 4K Mixed 76.2 261% 92.1 MB/s	DQ Read 843 DQ Write 759 DQ Mixed 308 366% 637 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 250% Great: 295%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB 14,526 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 433GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 174 177 169 179 175 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 363 Write 159 Mixed 217 SusWrite 174 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 3.8 42% 9.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB 20,439 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	MC Read 33 MC Write 35 MC Mixed 27 90% 31.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 35.6 SC Mixed 27.1 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	2,024x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	849x
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 79%, 8,783 samples	564x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	488x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	425x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	409x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	165x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	1,057x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	254x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	223x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16