| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME H410M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200403 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 17 '20 at 20:20 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | IRN-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
84%
Excellent
|
84% 148 Pts
|
73% 603 Pts
|
60% 978 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Gigabyte(1458 36C3) 2GB
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.2%
Poor
|
24% 30.9 fps
|
24% 29.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF430400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 140 138 150 136 127 MB/s
|
53.1%
Above average
|
63% 282 MB/s
|
73% 25.8 MB/s
|
39% 78.8 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
497GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 130 130 129 122 MB/s
|
73.9%
Very good
|
85% 115 MB/s
|
227% 1.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial STK4U2400D17081C 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
55.1%
Above average
|
54% 19 GB/s
|
48% 16.8 GB/s
|
57% 70.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME H410M-A Builds (Compare 1,856 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME H410M-A
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-10400FIntel $99Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 595x |
| Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 337x |
| Core i5-10400Intel $125Bench 84%, 71,804 samples | 266x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 145x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 129x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 123x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $282 |