Intel Intel

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel Intel  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191018
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 09:31
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 83%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J3455
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Memory 17.4
1-Core 34.6
2-Core 72.2
22% 41.4 Pts
4-Core 133
8-Core 149
18% 141 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1.9
1% 1.83 fps
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ShanDianZhe-128G 128GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0920A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 167 60 45 39 39 MB/s
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.8% Average
Read 217
Write 186
Mixed 198
SusWrite 89.9
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 14.4
76% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 44.1
66% 122 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
25.2% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 340
12% 340 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel Intel

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback