Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190729
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 17 '20 at 03:13
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 77.8 1-Core 109 2-Core 196 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 771 69% 582 Pts	64-Core 1,076 67% 1,076 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX 3,983 User benchmarks, average bench 8% EVGA(3842 C874) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	7.64% Terrible	Lighting 10.4 Reflection 13.3 Parallax 3.7 8% 9.13 fps	MRender 9.6 Gravity 8.8 Splatting 4.8 6% 7.73 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.64% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 275GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 236 208 162 162 167 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 448 Mixed 382 SusWrite 201 86% 382 MB/s	4K Read 39.8 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 50.9 165% 55.3 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 361 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 134%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 340GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 29 30 30 31 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30 16,754 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 145GB free Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 53 53 53 53 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	32.6% Below average	Read 60.7 Write 51.2 Mixed 44.1 SusWrite 52.5 38% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 41%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 206GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 111 140 117 113 123 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 135 Write 124 Mixed 66.4 SusWrite 118 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 234% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 5TB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 192 195 192 196 195 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 180 Mixed 70.1 SusWrite 193 115% 158 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.2 401% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB 76,101 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 39.1 MC Write 37 MC Mixed 34.8 106% 37 GB/s	SC Read 24.9 SC Write 36.7 SC Mixed 28.8 86% 30.1 GB/s	Latency 84.7 47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)