| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
| Motherboard | To Intel X79 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190717 |
| Uptime | 0.6 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 16 '20 at 14:45 |
| Run Duration | 97 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
|
49.3%
Average
|
40% 58.4 Pts
|
22% 181 Pts
|
36% 573 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
|
26.8%
Poor
|
25% 33.3 fps
|
31% 38.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
52% 234 MB/s
|
71% 22.2 MB/s
|
110% 132 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
43.1%
Average
|
47% 16.5 GB/s
|
16% 5.47 GB/s
|
45% 88.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,969 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: To Intel X79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 505x |
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 215x |
| Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples | 95x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 140x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 112x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 90x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $158 |