Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	31.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Memory 75.3 1-Core 69.6 2-Core 146 57% 96.9 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 232 31% 232 Pts	64-Core 233 14% 233 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170 16,214 User benchmarks, average bench 11% HP(103C 1098) 2GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.09 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Lighting 13.6 Reflection 15.9 Parallax 11.1 11% 13.5 fps	MRender 11 Gravity 13.5 Splatting 14.6 11% 13 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 11%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Colorful SL300 160GB 355 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0616B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 50 98 77 99 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Read 321 Write 396 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 120 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 1.2 33% 9.7 MB/s	DQ Read 69.5 DQ Write 39.7 DQ Mixed 21 25% 43.4 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 830B NT2GC64B88G0NF-DI 6GB 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53% Above average	MC Read 20.2 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 15.1 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 17.6 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 89.8 45% 89.8 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16