Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	99.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 Mobile Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8783
Memory	59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '20 at 06:54
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10850H 6,246 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Memory 84.7 1-Core 154 2-Core 298 97% 179 Pts	4-Core 574 8-Core 917 92% 745 Pts	64-Core 1106 68% 1106 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design 562 User benchmarks, average bench 90% HP(103C 8783) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4364 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	99.2% Outstanding	Lighting 120 Reflection 140 Parallax 130 98% 130 fps	MRender 150 Gravity 113 Splatting 115 102% 126 fps
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 99.2% Great: 102%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GB 17,828 User benchmarks, average bench 240% 386GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS0NEXF SusWrite @10s intervals: 1962 812 808 821 825 824 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	282% Outstanding	Read 2,390 Write 2,222 Mixed 1,571 SusWrite 1,009 402% 1,798 MB/s	4K Read 56.3 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 71.7 235% 78.9 MB/s	DQ Read 950 DQ Write 1,386 DQ Mixed 1,082 843% 1,140 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 282% Great: 306%
Kxg60znv1t02 KIOXIA 1TB 4,378 User benchmarks, average bench 208% 954GB free Firmware: AGHA4101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1984 1615 1620 1623 1617 700 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	260% Outstanding	Read 1,478 Write 1,987 Mixed 1,444 SusWrite 1,527 364% 1,609 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 51 171% 64.6 MB/s	DQ Read 983 DQ Write 1,488 DQ Mixed 1,019 832% 1,163 MB/s
Poor: 97% ↑ This bench: 260% Great: 295%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMAA4GS6MJR8N-VK 2x31.5GB 267 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	MC Read 32.1 MC Write 33.3 MC Mixed 26 87% 30.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.4 SC Write 37.4 SC Mixed 28.1 80% 28 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	323x
Quadro T2000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 39%, 1,016 samples	143x
Quadro T1000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 36%, 566 samples	100x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	84x
KIOXIA 1TBKxg60znv1t02Bench 208%, 4,378 samples	79x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	77x

RAM
HMAA4GS6AJR8N-XN 1x31GBHynixBench 48%, 958 samples	69x
16ATF4G64HZ-3G2E2 1x31GBMicronBench 49%, 283 samples	46x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	42x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16