| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 93% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150804 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 15 '20 at 04:37 |
| Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.5%
Good
|
59% 96 Pts
|
40% 334 Pts
|
27% 431 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
|
54.5%
Above average
|
56% 68.7 fps
|
52% 64.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 377 385 396 404 388 MB/s
|
93%
Outstanding
|
87% 387 MB/s
|
132% 45.9 MB/s
|
194% 260 MB/s
|
|
Netac NVMe SSD 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: S1218A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 231 124 131 118 130 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
102% 458 MB/s
|
148% 55.7 MB/s
|
308% 439 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.8%
Average
|
49% 17.1 GB/s
|
31% 10.9 GB/s
|
56% 71.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 257 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 138x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 29x |
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 19x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 22x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 18x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $494 |