Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 92.8 2-Core 156 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 439 47% 374 Pts	64-Core 450 28% 450 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB 3,164 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 904GB free (System drive) Firmware: GKAOA94A SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 73 74 65 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 77.8 Write 77.4 Mixed 45.9 SusWrite 72.4 50% 68.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 47%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB 12,134 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 7GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 13 13 14 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Read 28.1 Write 20.5 Mixed 22.6 SusWrite 13.1 27% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 4.1 253% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GB 6,584 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.7% Average	MC Read 15.8 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 14.2 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.2 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,229x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	447x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	394x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	79x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	59x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	50x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16