Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3050 14,457 User benchmarks, average bench 19% CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Memory 46.4 1-Core 21.5 2-Core 43.7 25% 37.2 Pts	4-Core 42.8 8-Core 42.5 6% 42.7 Pts	64-Core 42.4 3% 42.4 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 1009) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.43% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 2.5 1% 1.73 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.3 2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.43% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 152GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 332 339 322 351 344 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 354 Write 271 Mixed 305 SusWrite 339 71% 317 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 33 4K Mixed 26.9 84% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 81.2 DQ Mixed 100 73% 95.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB 40,451 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.8 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 5.8 19% 6.77 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 22%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3050IntelBench 19%, 14,457 samples	31x
Pentium N3700IntelBench 26%, 11,299 samples	19x
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	19x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	105x

RAM
AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS 1x4GBAdataBench 20%, 3,685 samples	23x
ACR16D3LFS1KBG/2G 1x2GBKingstonBench 17%, 2,515 samples	15x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	6x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16