Monster TULPAR T7 V20.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V20.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.2
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200708
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 13 '20 at 11:16
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 247
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 576
63% 496 Pts
64-Core 682
42% 682 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1097) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6079
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26% Poor
Lighting 30
Reflection 30
Parallax 2.6
24% 20.9 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 46.5
29% 33.5 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 26%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 209 219 219 218 218 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 920
Write 217
Mixed 446
SusWrite 216
99% 450 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 49.4
192% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 515
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 192
183% 297 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 124%
Great: 199%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
5GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.6 3.6 3 5.4 4.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 13.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4
11% 9.43 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 6%
VendorCo ProductCode 8GB
7GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Read 12.4
Write 5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 4.3
8% 6.93 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 23.4
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 26.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 83%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.2 Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback