Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '17 at 01:37
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 254
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 499
66% 496 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 30% Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force 240GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFC Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 515
Write 297
Mixed 387
88% 400 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 93.9
4K Mixed 13.8
108% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 61
114% 225 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 135
Write 146
Mixed 137
105% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.29
113% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
723GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 183
Mixed 167
131% 174 MB/s
4K Read 1.36
4K Write 2.91
4K Mixed 0.38
153% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
413GB free
Firmware: GR2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 100
Mixed 92.6
72% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.19
72% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GTZB F4-3200C16-4GTZB F4-3200C16-8GTZB F4-3200C16-4GTZB 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.8% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 25.6
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 24.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,159
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback