Lenovo 43531L6

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 43531L6 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	32.5 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150107
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '20 at 23:09
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	84%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2603 0 224 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Memory 56.6 1-Core 35.3 2-Core 79.7 36% 57.2 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 176 20% 155 Pts	64-Core 163 10% 163 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Gigabyte(1458 2272) CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	11.6% Very poor	Lighting 14.7 Reflection 17.8 Parallax 19.6 12% 17.4 fps	MRender 14.8 Gravity 14.3 Splatting 11.3 11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90 17,487 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 164 165 177 174 159 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.9% Poor	Read 182 Write 75.2 Mixed 102 SusWrite 168 29% 132 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 13.9 4K Mixed 8.6 27% 9.4 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 25.4 DQ Mixed 35.7 34% 54.9 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 105%
Hitachi HDT725050VLA360 500GB-$159 3,335 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 248GB free Firmware: A7EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 22 14 18 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 18.3 Write 13.7 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 18.1 13% 17 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 40% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 40%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 53GB free Firmware: 1H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 66 67 67 66 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 73.3 Write 73.1 Mixed 52.3 SusWrite 66.2 49% 66.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 69%
WD Elements 1.5TB 5,064 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 675GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 19 21 28 21 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 18.1 Write 20.7 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 22.5 27% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.2 39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU7AFR8A Samsung M391B5273DH0- HMT41GU7AFR8A Samsung M391B5273DH0- RMR1881ED58E9 HMT41GU7AFR8A Samsung M391B5273DH0- 40GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.9% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 13.1 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 4.1 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 43531L6

Performance Results

PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)