Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 96% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA550
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200916
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '20 at 19:57
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Memory 94.8 1-Core 135 2-Core 268 92% 166 Pts	4-Core 451 8-Core 701 71% 576 Pts	64-Core 829 51% 829 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466 261,508 User benchmarks, average bench 131% Asus(1043 8711) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	121% Outstanding	Lighting 160 Reflection 155 Parallax 176 131% 164 fps	MRender 165 Gravity 146 Splatting 123 116% 145 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 139%
Intel UHD Graphics 187,969 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 2011) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	6% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 9.6 Parallax 8.2 5% 7.93 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 7 Splatting 11.1 8% 9.87 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GB 4,252 User benchmarks, average bench 231% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7201Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 844 775 798 806 778 814 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	251% Outstanding	Read 2,047 Write 1,998 Mixed 1,507 SusWrite 803 356% 1,589 MB/s	4K Read 57.2 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 74.4 242% 81.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,120 DQ Write 903 DQ Mixed 1,044 772% 1,022 MB/s
Poor: 167% ↑ This bench: 251% Great: 297%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 915GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1769 1667 1675 1673 1675 1677 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	318% Outstanding	Read 2052 Write 1,982 Mixed 1,553 SusWrite 1,689 409% 1,819 MB/s	4K Read 60.3 4K Write 127 4K Mixed 80.6 262% 89.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,270 DQ Write 1,040 DQ Mixed 1,167 871% 1,159 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 318% Great: 410%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C20 2x16GB 909 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	84.8% Excellent	MC Read 34.1 MC Write 33.2 MC Mixed 23.3 86% 30.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 30.2 SC Mixed 26.1 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 57.6 69% 57.6 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 105%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	2,024x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	849x
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 79%, 8,783 samples	564x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	488x

SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	425x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	409x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	165x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	1,057x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	254x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	223x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16