Asrock X570 Steel Legend

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Steel Legend  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1768 x 992 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201106
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 12 '20 at 17:21
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 73.3
1-Core 148
2-Core 273
89% 165 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 1,094
100% 837 Pts
64-Core 1,976
122% 1,976 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 196
Parallax 204
147% 193 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 189
Splatting 130
123% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$300
3TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT343.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1697 2117 988 984 971 986 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,312
Write 2,170
Mixed 1,444
SusWrite 1,290
352% 1554 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 77.4
4K Mixed 47.6
150% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 367
DQ Mixed 561
413% 552 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 203%
Great: 313%
OCZ AGILITY4 128GB
5GB free
Firmware: 1.5.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 57 111 136 128 137 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.1% Average
Read 264
Write 24.4
Mixed 86.4
SusWrite 112
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 26.1
4K Mixed 18.8
61% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 66.9
DQ Mixed 133
96% 128 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 81%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275
72GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 413 418 415 416 414 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 97.7
Write 6.2
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 359
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 17
54% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 77.8
DQ Mixed 147
102% 130 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 135%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$137
28GB free
Firmware: AR17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 33 30 32 31 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.41% Terrible
Read 3.5
Write 47.4
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 29
16% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0
22% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 9.41%
Great: 87%
SanDisk Cruzer Micro 8GB
3GB free, PID 5151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.9 5.1 5.1 5 5.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
6.19% Terrible
Read 23.4
Write 9
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.8
11% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.19%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 31.8
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 26.6
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Steel Legend Builds (Compare 1,479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Steel Legend

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,276
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback