PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z820 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158B |
Memory | 105.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191028 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Dec 11 '20 at 15:07 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | HKG-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
58.4%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Vi550 S3 SSD 1TB
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 188 198 203 240 185 MB/s
|
47.1%
Average
|
|||
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
2TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.4 4.1 4.2 4.4 4.3 MB/s
|
1.32%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples | 145x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 113x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 87x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 145x |
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 139x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 65x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |