Asus M52BC_M32BC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemAsus M52BC_M32BC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M52BC_M32BC
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '20 at 07:00
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8310
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 128
58% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 402
40% 315 Pts
64-Core 375
25% 375 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 255
Asus(1043 8620) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
8.38% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 12.1
Parallax 14.5
8% 12.3 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 10.9
Splatting 8.8
8% 9.27 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.38%
Great: 9%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$35
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 12 13 33 4.6 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 419
Write 189
Mixed 278
SusWrite 44.3
51% 233 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 24.1
104% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 17.7
52% 115 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$45
639GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 137 131 135 148 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 157
Write 133
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 142
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 106%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
628GB free
Firmware: 0636
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 17 17 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 27.5
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 17.5
18% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 66%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 32GB
22GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.3 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
9.53% Terrible
Read 15.3
Write 14
Mixed 16.1
SusWrite 4.5
16% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.3
152% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.53%
Great: 13%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
670GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 29.6
Write 29.7
Mixed 20
SusWrite 15.6
31% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 14.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M52BC_M32BC Builds (Compare 404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M52BC_M32BC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback