| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190813 |
| Uptime | 0.6 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 10 '20 at 22:16 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
85.7%
Excellent
|
81% 146 Pts
|
63% 456 Pts
|
25% 406 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
59.6%
Above average
|
63% 75.9 fps
|
53% 65.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 347 403 419 445 446 MB/s
|
95.1%
Outstanding
|
90% 397 MB/s
|
134% 48.1 MB/s
|
168% 248 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
460GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 103 107 110 111 111 MB/s
|
62.3%
Good
|
69% 93.8 MB/s
|
147% 1.07 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8GBF1X08LIII43-12-K 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
35.6%
Below average
|
35% 12.1 GB/s
|
25% 8.6 GB/s
|
57% 70 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,708 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,071x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 930x |
| Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 278x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 355x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 296x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 231x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $263 |