Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics83.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory106.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 480 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150911
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 10 '20 at 19:48
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 198
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 671
63% 522 Pts
64-Core 927
57% 927 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 124
Parallax 110
85% 113 fps
MRender 99.3
Gravity 105
Splatting 92.6
80% 98.9 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 925 1283 856 766 1280 1308 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1881
Write 607
Mixed 813
SusWrite 1,070
242% 1,093 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 49.1
177% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 393
DQ Mixed 408
344% 510 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 220%
Great: 283%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 3TB
215GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 561 599 602 605 607 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 808
Write 232
Mixed 521
SusWrite 557
118% 529 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 38.2
128% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 412
DQ Mixed 373
282% 376 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 123%
Great: 561%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 12TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 29 30 28 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 279
Write 7.5
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 28.3
65% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.1
245% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 212%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
27GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.1 4.9 5 5.2 4.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
6.98% Terrible
Read 32
Write 5
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 5
15% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
44% 2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.98%
Great: 9%
Compact Flash Card 128GB
67GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 143
Write 136
Mixed 58.2
136% 113 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.9
191% 5.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 55%
LaCie 2big Dock Thunde 16TB
13.5TB free, PID 109a
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 259 256 256 249 238 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
114% Outstanding
Read 260
Write 240
Mixed 207
SusWrite 237
318% 236 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 3.9
442% 13.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 114%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB-$1,291
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 48.1
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 41
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 21.5
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 112%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $770
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback