Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 10 '20 at 19:37
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 143
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 430
44% 358 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 188
Parallax 178
138% 178 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 182
Splatting 127
120% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 156 149 80 79 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 319
Write 210
Mixed 174
SusWrite 112
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 40.8
140% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 159
135% 198 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 87%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
4GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 73 75 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 365
Write 74
Mixed 117
SusWrite 73.5
34% 157 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 34.9
117% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 67.5
DQ Mixed 83.9
64% 88.2 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 69%
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
57GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 277 364 374 375 372 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 394
Mixed 212
SusWrite 323
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 38.5
145% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 240
182% 244 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 119%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
104GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 113 110 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 132
Write 135
Mixed 111
SusWrite 112
91% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
108GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 117 116 119 119 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 122
Write 121
Mixed 98.2
SusWrite 116
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 109%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70
266GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 110 109 110 111 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 120
Write 114
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 108
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.6% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback