Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory107.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 800 x 480 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150911
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 10 '20 at 19:27
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 101
2-Core 196
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 679
62% 523 Pts
64-Core 948
59% 948 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 124
Parallax 110
84% 113 fps
MRender 97.8
Gravity 103
Splatting 91.9
79% 97.6 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 626 743 737 839 1221 1269 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,850
Write 437
Mixed 725
SusWrite 906
216% 979 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 49
176% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 703
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 458
352% 491 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 206%
Great: 283%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 3TB
215GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 364 328 320 317 316 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,543
Write 366
Mixed 532
SusWrite 337
151% 694 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 37.3
132% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 437
DQ Write 387
DQ Mixed 379
293% 401 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 141%
Great: 561%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 12TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 26 25 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 310
Write 21.2
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 27.1
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.2
266% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 212%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
27GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.1 5.4 5.1 4.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
8.67% Terrible
Read 38.8
Write 5
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 5.1
15% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.8
56% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.67%
Great: 9%
Compact Flash Card 128GB
67GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 143
Write 137
Mixed 56.7
135% 112 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.9
192% 5.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 55%
LaCie 2big Dock Thunde 16TB
13.5TB free, PID 109a
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 254 256 255 248 239 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
110% Outstanding
Read 242
Write 252
Mixed 197
SusWrite 235
315% 231 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 4
435% 12.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C14 8x16GB-$1,291
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 47.1
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 41.2
125% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 20.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 111%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $770
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback