| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Boot Drive | 16.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| System | Intel Calistoga & ICH7M Chipset |
| Motherboard | Intel MPAD-MSAE Customer Reference Boards (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20060413 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 10 '20 at 18:30 |
| Run Duration | 167 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 62% |
PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel T2300
U1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
|
32%
Below average
|
26% 32.5 Pts
|
4% 27.2 Pts
|
2% 31.2 Pts
|
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 65 29 15 64 34 MB/s
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
16% 71.7 MB/s
|
28% 9.23 MB/s
|
11% 15.2 MB/s
|
|
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
16GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 5.7 2.4 4.8 5.4 MB/s
|
4.4%
Terrible
|
11% 9.35 MB/s
|
13% 1.17 MB/s
| |
|
WD My Book 25EE 6TB
2TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 16 18 19 MB/s
|
21.1%
Poor
|
28% 21.4 MB/s
|
187% 2.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
11.5%
Very poor
|
10% 3.43 GB/s
|
8% 2.93 GB/s
|
31% 127 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MPAD-MSAE Customer Reference Boards Builds (Compare 2 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel MPAD-MSAE Customer Reference Boards
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |