Asus VivoBook S15 X530UN

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook S15 X530UN (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X530UN
Memory	0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190521
Uptime	20.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '20 at 22:49
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	18%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8550U 184,356 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 81.5 1-Core 106 2-Core 204 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 509 50% 408 Pts	64-Core 498 31% 498 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 18CE) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	1.94% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 17.7 Parallax 2.5 2% 7.43 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 3.5 2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.94% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W128G1002 128GB 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6103002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 59 43 64 40 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 295 Write 104 Mixed 180 SusWrite 59.6 35% 160 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 12.9 78% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 229 163% 214 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 125GB free Firmware: JU000J SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 83 83 84 84 84 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 142 Write 143 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 84.3 77% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.6 203% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB 122,420 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.6% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 9.8 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 7.3 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook S15 X530UN Builds (Compare 204 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook S15 X530UN

CPU
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	128x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	75x
Core i3-8130UIntelBench 48%, 25,471 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	141x
MX150-0NvidiaBench 14%, 29,453 samples	63x

SSD
SD9SN8W256G1002 256GBSandiskBench 71%, 4,960 samples	79x
SD9SN8W128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 3,521 samples	35x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV512TBN 512GBBench 79%, 14,424 samples	9x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	32x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	25x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16