Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit, , Цвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121102
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '20 at 15:57
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 74.3 1-Core 76.8 2-Core 150 59% 100 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 336 37% 290 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	27% Poor	Lighting 30.7 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 40.9 25% 34.2 fps	MRender 40.7 Gravity 40.9 Splatting 32.9 31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 310 250 337 400 349 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Read 433 Write 33.8 Mixed 359 SusWrite 313 63% 285 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 20.6 71% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 194 179% 277 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 95%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 348GB free Firmware: JA0OA560 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 53 53 53 53 53 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 98 Write 94.8 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 52.4 52% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.3 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 11.3 34% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 91.8 44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	166x
Core i3-2350MIntelBench 47%, 24,896 samples	162x
Pentium B950IntelBench 43%, 7,305 samples	71x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	239x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	165x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	123x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	18x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	13x

RAM
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	52x
M471B5273CM0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 871 samples	35x
QUM3S-8G1333C9 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 22 samples	22x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $253

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16