MSI K9A2 CF-F (MS-7388)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	MICRO-STAR MS-7388
Motherboard	MSI K9A2 CF-F (MS-7388) (all builds)
Memory	4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091201
Uptime	5.5 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '20 at 22:18
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	42%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 925-$150 5,211 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Memory 63.2 1-Core 37.5 2-Core 72.1 38% 57.6 Pts	4-Core 116 8-Core 133 16% 124 Pts	64-Core 134 8% 134 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55% Above average	Lighting 68.3 Reflection 51.8 Parallax 66.1 56% 62.1 fps	MRender 66.5 Gravity 68 Splatting 63.5 54% 66 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate STM3500418AS 500GB 8,252 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 390GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 34 41 54 54 60 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	47% Average	Read 117 Write 126 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 46.6 64% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 71%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183 4,107 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 344GB free Firmware: CT100-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 62 60 60 61 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	29.8% Poor	Read 42.8 Write 29.2 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 60.5 27% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 29.8% Great: 42%
MB2000GCWLT 2TB 396 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 1.5TB free Firmware: HPG3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 140 149 149 149 148 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Read 138 Write 151 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 146 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 173% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 93%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB 31,309 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 575GB free, PID 25e1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 25 Write 23.6 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 15.6 29% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.9 141% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 65%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 343GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 24.8 Write 23.6 Mixed 18 SusWrite 15.7 27% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 7.6 21% 7.23 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.8 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16