Asus P8B75-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-V  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '17 at 14:16
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 94.8
1-Core 83.8
2-Core 174
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 322
45% 330 Pts
64-Core 332
21% 332 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Lighting 38.4
Reflection 34.5
Parallax 46.7
31% 39.9 fps
MRender 30.4
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 38.8
28% 33.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 309
Write 325
Mixed 256
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 19.7
96% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 36.3
DQ Write 62.1
DQ Mixed 19.9
23% 39.4 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 115%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
215GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 128
Write 135
Mixed 97.6
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 2.24
4K Mixed 0.26
90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
148GB free
Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 91
Write 93.7
Mixed 28.8
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.25
69% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 53%
Great: 112%
JMicron 750GB
91GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 29.3
Mixed 29.7
39% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.21
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.9% Good
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 20.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 18.2
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 57.7
69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-V Builds (Compare 1,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $442
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback