Asus EPIGI F1GV-9

Performance Results


Gaming 109% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 90% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	75.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus EPIGI F1GV-9 (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190410
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '20 at 04:15
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	78%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	99.5% Outstanding	Memory 96.1 1-Core 152 2-Core 297 100% 182 Pts	4-Core 576 8-Core 687 82% 631 Pts	64-Core 713 44% 713 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 99.5% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2577 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.08 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Lighting 136 Reflection 150 Parallax 152 110% 146 fps	MRender 121 Gravity 143 Splatting 126 106% 130 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 401GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 399 402 406 404 386 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 398 Write 327 Mixed 291 SusWrite 394 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 38.9 4K Mixed 19.1 67% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 367 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 253 210% 303 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 133%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 29GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 308 308 309 309 307 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 453 Write 305 Mixed 270 SusWrite 305 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 18.9 76% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 286 DQ Write 83 DQ Mixed 132 111% 167 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 76%
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 16GB free Firmware: 03070009 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 425 Write 311 Mixed 296 76% 344 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 23.2 77% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 139 DQ Mixed 119 96% 137 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$25 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 38GB free Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 115 128 97 69 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 408 Write 356 Mixed 317 SusWrite 128 68% 302 MB/s	4K Read 12.7 4K Write 35.3 4K Mixed 12.6 54% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 280 DQ Mixed 28.1 76% 157 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 86%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 682GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 126 126 126 125 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 120 Write 94.2 Mixed 95.7 SusWrite 124 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair 1KWO3W2BOUVMQU7IN6 2x8GB 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	97.6% Outstanding	MC Read 38.6 MC Write 37.3 MC Mixed 29 100% 35 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 35.3 SC Mixed 31.6 80% 27.9 GB/s	Latency 53.7 74% 53.7 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16