Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	97.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131002
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 10 '17 at 23:38
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 88.2 1-Core 71.7 2-Core 143 62% 101 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 437 43% 352 Pts	64-Core 423 26% 423 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.7% Outstanding	Lighting 110 Reflection 158 Parallax 175 90% 148 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 169 Splatting 124 113% 140 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40 2,820 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.0.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 114 75066346 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 -65970697652884 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 564 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 149 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 36 82 68724850724 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 75066346 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 75066346 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 75066346 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 14498 (EA) Unknown 0 0 9170 (F1) Unknown 0 0 9170 (F2) Unknown 0 0 8319	41.9% Average	Read 185 Write 140 Mixed 154 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 58.8 4K Mixed 12.9 79% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 33.2 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 10.5 24% 48.1 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 80%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 22GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1852 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1678 (B1) Unknown 95 95 55 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 44 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 81 81 18713 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1475 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9833061563	65.7% Good	Read 436 Write 288 Mixed 235 70% 319 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 39.9 4K Mixed 20.1 94% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 47.7 DQ Write 66.6 DQ Mixed 19.5 25% 44.6 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 118%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$42 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 22GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 807 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 309 (B1) Unknown 96 96 17 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 42 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 94 94 5228 (EB) Unknown 99 99 91 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4866446211	55.8% Above average	Read 375 Write 241 Mixed 180 58% 265 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 31.4 4K Mixed 14.6 81% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 46.7 DQ Write 52.6 DQ Mixed 18.7 23% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB 1,530 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.9% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 15.1 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 11.4 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	127x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	73x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	24x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	13x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $396

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16