PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Pavilion g6 Notebook PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1670 |
Memory | 6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130124 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 07 '20 at 16:01 |
Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 47% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
52%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon HD 7450M
HP(103C 166C) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.882.2.0
|
1.79%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 290 319 327 330 294 MB/s
|
80.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Mass Storage Device 320GB
9GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 26 26 26 25 MB/s
|
12.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples | 587x |
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples | 246x |
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples | 243x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 1,394x |
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 803x |
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples | 285x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $80 |