Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199 14,351 User benchmarks, average bench 38% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Memory 63.1 1-Core 51.2 2-Core 87.2 42% 67.2 Pts	4-Core 115 8-Core 127 16% 121 Pts	64-Core 141 9% 141 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310M 8,303 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sony(104D 9074) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 340.72 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.12% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 0.3 1% 1.03 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.12% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 205 193 200 184 193 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46% Average	Read 211 Write 193 Mixed 182 SusWrite 197 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 21.3 4K Mixed 17.3 56% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 180 135% 180 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 10.3 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 6.4 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i7 M 620IntelBench 42%, 9,076 samples	3x
Core i3 M 350Intel $199Bench 38%, 14,351 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples	4x

SSD
750 EVO 500GBSamsungBench 103%, 31,052 samples	2x
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $107Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	3x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16