PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds) |
Memory | 26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190515 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 06 '20 at 17:00 |
Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
|
94.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 298 278 284 277 269 MB/s
|
93.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
250GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 133 134 132 133 MB/s
|
76.4%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 651x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 205x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 169x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 127x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 114x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 111x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $544 |