Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2940 3,995 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Memory 61.5 1-Core 21.3 2-Core 42.5 30% 41.8 Pts	4-Core 83.4 8-Core 83.8 11% 83.6 Pts	64-Core 84.5 5% 84.5 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 161D) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3408 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.76% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.57 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 1.2 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.76% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: N191129a SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 231 232 230 233 228 MB/s Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.3% Good	Read 250 Write 240 Mixed 237 SusWrite 232 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 31.3 108% 35.2 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 169 DQ Mixed 144 110% 147 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.9% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 7.4 22% 7.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 4.9 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 123 32% 123 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	191x
Pentium N3540IntelBench 33%, 17,036 samples	188x
Celeron N2830IntelBench 29%, 10,608 samples	58x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	519x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	2x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16