$(default_string) $(DEFAULT_STRING)

Performance Results

Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop 28%
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System$(default_string) $(DEFAULT_STRING)  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 05 '20 at 16:58
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron J4125
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
25% Poor
Memory 25.5
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 79.8
32% 54.8 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 122
19% 134 Pts
64-Core 111
8% 111 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 2.1
1% 2.2 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2
1% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 352 336 326 341 332 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 358
Write 343
Mixed 261
SusWrite 333
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 28
94% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 143
116% 165 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
20.8% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 7.4
23% 8 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.3
10% 3.6 GB/s
Latency 283
14% 283 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical $(DEFAULT_STRING) Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: $(default_string) $(DEFAULT_STRING)

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback