DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory2.4 GB free of 9 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090728
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 05 '20 at 04:10
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 123
58% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 297
32% 254 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 360A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 180
Parallax 194
122% 174 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 180
Splatting 120
115% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
707GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 181 180 182 185 187 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.9% Good
Read 224
Write 230
Mixed 227
SusWrite 181
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 34.5
108% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 197
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 133%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
222GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 182 184 188 190 188 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.4% Above average
Read 219
Write 226
Mixed 190
SusWrite 184
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 20
73% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 158
125% 173 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 97%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
474GB free
Firmware: 1AA01117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 94 95 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 73.7
Write 104
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 94.7
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 62%
WDC WD20 EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 157
Write 136
Mixed 65
SusWrite 36.8
121% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.5
318% 4.3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 0.6
348% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 89%
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
8GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 34 35 28 24 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 101
Write 106
Mixed 58
SusWrite 32.1
96% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.2
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 54%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
34GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 34 35 35 24 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 129
Write 110
Mixed 71
SusWrite 32.7
107% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 55%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
2TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.5 2.2 1.5 11 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 141
Write 120
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 7.3
100% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 33%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 89.8
Write 89.7
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 18.9
82% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 60%
HGST HUS 728T8TALE6L4 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46% Average
Read 165
Write 136
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 18.9
122% 100 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 1.7
259% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 15.4
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 10.4
26% 8.93 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback