PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000 (all builds) |
Motherboard | DELL 0X501H |
Memory | 2.4 GB free of 9 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090728 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Dec 05 '20 at 04:10 |
Run Duration | 249 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.8%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 360A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
116%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
707GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 181 180 182 185 187 MB/s
|
62.9%
Good
|
|||
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
222GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 182 184 188 190 188 MB/s
|
50.4%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
474GB free
Firmware: 1AA01117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 94 95 94 94 MB/s
|
48.5%
Average
|
|||
WDC WD20 EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 36 MB/s
|
57.5%
Above average
|
|||
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
8GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 34 35 28 24 MB/s
|
27.7%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
34GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 34 35 35 24 MB/s
|
33.7%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
2TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 1.5 2.2 1.5 11 26 MB/s
|
27.2%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
|
24.7%
Poor
|
|||
HGST HUS 728T8TALE6L4 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
|
46%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 9GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
|
40.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 313x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 19x |
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples | 16x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 38x |
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples | 20x |
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples | 16x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $177 |