Performance Results


Gaming 60% Destroyer	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 60% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	82.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190419
Uptime	14.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '20 at 19:05
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 67.7 1-Core 105 2-Core 208 70% 127 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 658 63% 522 Pts	64-Core 1,084 67% 1,084 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.6% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 111 Parallax 101 83% 105 fps	MRender 93.6 Gravity 103 Splatting 100 81% 98.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 263 258 261 250 216 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	88% Excellent	Read 448 Write 462 Mixed 398 SusWrite 246 87% 388 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 64.1 4K Mixed 42.2 147% 48.4 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 224 166% 218 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 152GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 127 122 121 120 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 108 Write 93.3 Mixed 63.2 SusWrite 122 71% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 109%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25 53,598 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 661GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 73 73 70 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 110 Write 107 Mixed 62 SusWrite 71.6 65% 87.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GVKB Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE F4-3200C16-8GVKB Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE 32GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	63.3% Good	MC Read 23.8 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 21.8 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 20.8 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 101%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 74%

Battleship

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1,510x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,316x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,304x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	890x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	789x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	686x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	1,558x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	1,520x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	960x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $678

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16