Acer Aspire TC-705

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics66.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire TC-705  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-705
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150325
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 15:42
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 371
48% 364 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.9% Good
Lighting 86.8
Reflection 84
Parallax 81.2
71% 84 fps
MRender 73.4
Gravity 81.9
Splatting 65.3
59% 73.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 313 302 302 302 302 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 459
Mixed 385
SusWrite 298
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 59.7
202% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 356
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46
63GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 438 459 466 467 468 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 437
Mixed 427
SusWrite 422
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 53.9
188% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 292
238% 339 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 120%
Great: 125%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 150 149 150 150 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 120
Write 120
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 146
72% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G ACR16D3LU1MNG/4G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 17.9
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-705 Builds (Compare 550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-705

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback