Performance Results


Gaming 109% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 97% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150318
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '20 at 07:11
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70 34,039 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	91% Outstanding	Memory 93 1-Core 124 2-Core 251 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 758 76% 619 Pts	64-Core 942 58% 942 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3609) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	120% Outstanding	Lighting 161 Reflection 262 Parallax 169 131% 197 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 171 Splatting 119 113% 140 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 168 166 169 166 163 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 372 Write 346 Mixed 346 SusWrite 166 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 38.1 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 50.5 168% 58.3 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 183 151% 219 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 836GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 177 177 178 181 186 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Read 373 Write 346 Mixed 337 SusWrite 179 69% 309 MB/s	4K Read 43.4 4K Write 89.7 4K Mixed 56.8 186% 63.3 MB/s	DQ Read 267 DQ Write 209 DQ Mixed 232 175% 236 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 202GB free Firmware: MX4OABX0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 89 89 92 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 70.2 Write 102 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 90 50% 68.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA 4x8GB 871 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.9% Very good	MC Read 30 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 24 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 21.9 SC Mixed 20.5 55% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 62 64% 62 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 122%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 101%

UFO

Desktop 84%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	79x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	61x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	60x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $154Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	36x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	28x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $941

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16