Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	48.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201022
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '20 at 23:40
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160 33,544 User benchmarks, average bench 82% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	89.5% Excellent	Memory 76.4 1-Core 144 2-Core 285 90% 168 Pts	4-Core 553 8-Core 778 84% 666 Pts	64-Core 829 51% 829 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 04C2) CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.2 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Lighting 63.1 Reflection 61.2 Parallax 82.9 51% 69.1 fps	MRender 58.9 Gravity 62.4 Splatting 44.2 44% 55.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 143 143 240 147 145 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.1% Below average	Read 233 Write 91.2 Mixed 84.3 SusWrite 176 32% 146 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 21.2 4K Mixed 12.1 51% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 14.4 DQ Write 15.6 DQ Mixed 14.7 11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB 8,831 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 488GB free Firmware: JP4OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 85 88 111 122 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 116 Write 124 Mixed 63.6 SusWrite 96.7 73% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 746GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 172 171 173 172 172 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 166 Mixed 105 SusWrite 172 115% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.2 237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 109%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 8GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 25 27 34 29 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 21.2 Write 25.6 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 29.9 34% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 24% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 44%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB 14,782 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 12GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 9.4 9.9 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.78% Terrible	Read 4.7 Write 2.5 Mixed 0.2 SusWrite 10.3 6% 4.43 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.78% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB 16,566 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.4% Very good	MC Read 32 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 29.1 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 21.3 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 27 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 87.5 46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $150Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	2,618x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $201Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,227x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	854x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	820x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	699x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	622x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	311x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	302x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	276x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	373x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	222x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	203x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $684

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16