Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-A/M.2  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '20 at 17:34
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 196
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 384
52% 387 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.88% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 5.9
4% 5.83 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 8.6
6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.88%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gainward(10B0 1C81) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.8% Poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 32.3
26% 33 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 33.5
Splatting 23
24% 31.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 79 72 85 82 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,180
Write 947
Mixed 793
SusWrite 137
170% 764 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 52
187% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 637
DQ Write 702
DQ Mixed 262
310% 534 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 143%
Great: 295%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
9GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 472
Write 342
Mixed 321
84% 379 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 39.9
142% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 105
120% 205 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
Kingston SUV500480G 480GB
48GB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 58 59 57 56 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41% Average
Read 354
Write 350
Mixed 288
SusWrite 57.9
59% 262 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 20.8
67% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 53.3
DQ Write 44.5
DQ Mixed 49.1
37% 49 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 41%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
7GB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 175
Write 139
Mixed 76.9
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
624GB free
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 58 59 57 56 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 118
Write 116
Mixed 74.2
SusWrite 57.6
68% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 69%
Verbatim Desktop HDD 3.0 4TB
633GB free, PID 0415
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 105 105 106 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 84.4
Write 104
Mixed 96.3
SusWrite 107
138% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
201% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 77%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
317GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 107 108 103 105 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 87.2
Write 92.9
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 105
122% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 49%
Seagate D3 Station 4TB
595GB free, PID 6125
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 101 92 94 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 115
Write 81.3
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 95.4
120% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 72%
WD Elements 1TB
930GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 4.8 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.93% Terrible
Read 35.3
Write 5
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 5.2
14% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.93%
Great: 43%
WD 10EADS External 1TB
191GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 32 32 33 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 33.7
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 32.6
44% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17%
Great: 21%
WD Elements 2TB
0GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.2
Write 35
Mixed 24.6
37% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
45% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.6% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 25
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 20.5
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback