| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20151116 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 03 '20 at 12:31 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | ZAF-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
74.8%
Very good
|
72% 124 Pts
|
54% 403 Pts
|
26% 416 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 147A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
126%
Outstanding
|
144% 168 fps
|
110% 139 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 121 121 119 123 135 MB/s
|
64.4%
Good
|
41% 183 MB/s
|
122% 49 MB/s
|
148% 203 MB/s
|
|
WD WD5000KS-00MNB0 500GB
72GB free
Firmware: 07.02E07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 46 48 48 48 48 MB/s
|
28%
Poor
|
34% 45.7 MB/s
|
157% 1.2 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 154 155 155 156 155 MB/s
|
80.9%
Excellent
|
83% 113 MB/s
|
391% 2.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FAD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
75.9%
Very good
|
78% 27.3 GB/s
|
63% 22.1 GB/s
|
51% 78.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-A Builds (Compare 1,069 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-A - $76
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 314x |
| Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 179x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 144x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 123x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 109x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 84x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 30% - Below average | Total price: $542 |