HP ProLiant ML330 G6

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	96.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	30.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP ProLiant ML330 G6 (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	13.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130702
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '20 at 22:09
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5620 3,527 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Proc 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 80.1 1-Core 63.5 2-Core 114 54% 85.8 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 262 28% 224 Pts	64-Core 276 17% 276 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 98% Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	96.7% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 124 Parallax 118 94% 119 fps	MRender 164 Gravity 105 Splatting 113 102% 127 fps
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 102%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69 25,452 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 77 103 110 131 124 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.1% Below average	Read 201 Write 180 Mixed 155 SusWrite 110 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 12.5 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 16.2 45% 12.7 MB/s	DQ Read 18.8 DQ Write 25.4 DQ Mixed 20.4 16% 21.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 60%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 67 67 67 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 134 Write 131 Mixed 77.2 SusWrite 66.1 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 100%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 23GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 67 67 67 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 64.2 Write 70.2 Mixed 39 SusWrite 66.1 44% 59.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 678GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 82 83 86 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 83.7 Write 87.5 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 80.6 57% 77.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 88%
WD Re 2TB-$54 16,276 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 96GB free Firmware: 01.01D01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 82 83 86 86 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 96.2 Write 86.7 Mixed 76 SusWrite 80.6 63% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 83%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,128 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 604GB free, PID a00c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 25 25 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 24.7 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 24.3 32% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 9 slots used 24GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.8% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 16.1 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 11 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ProLiant ML330 G6 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant ML330 G6

CPU
Xeon E5620IntelBench 59%, 3,527 samples	7x
Xeon E5504IntelBench 52%, 489 samples	1x
Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	3x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	2x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	1x
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	1x

RAM
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	5x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	2x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16